Monday, April 22, 2013

Home Loan Numbers Boost Because Of Low Interest Rates

As investors and home owners are taking advantage of low interest rates, Australia’s housing sector is in the uncertain stages of a upturn.

The first monthly ascend since September last year is only the number of home loans taken out in February rose 2 per cent.

That’s in spite of the percentage of loans granted to first home buyers falling to its lowest point in nine years.

The lowest level since June 2004 is the 14.4 per cent were first home buyers of those who took out home loans in February.

The rise in approvals was a sign low interest rates were providing a boost for the housing sector said St George senior economist Jo Heffernan.

“We are expecting to see some further pick up from here, but we would need to see a few more months’ data to confirm a pick-up was underway,” she said.

According to property research firm RP Data Home prices rose 2.8 per cent in the March quarter while building approvals for new homes rose 3.1 per cent in February, says the Australian Bureau of Statistics.

Housing is one of numerous underperforming divisions the Reserve Bank of Australia is including on to progress during 2013 to facilitate counterbalance a projected hold up in mining investment.

The RBA reduce the cash rate 1.25 percentage points in 2012, conveying it to its present low level of three per cent.

But at the same time as builders welcomed February’s enhancement in home loans, they said more desired to be done to motivate growth in housing construction.

“The concern is today’s figure could be another in the volatile series of rises and falls witnessed over the past year,” Master Builders Australia chief economist Peter Jones said.

“The Reserve Bank must continue to act by cutting interest rates and ensuring
a sustained building industry recovery can take place and boost the non-mining economy,” Mr Jones said.

Investors were driving the nascent recovery in the sector said CommSec chief
economist Craig James.

But he said the continued fall in first home buyers was concerning.

Since October the percentage of loans taken out by first home buyers has been falling when New South Wales and Queensland discontinued providing out first home owner grants to people buying established properties.

“Perhaps the state governments need to rethink about the way that the incentives are provided so they can provide some assistance to the market,” Mr James said.

Bu Ms Heffernan expects first home owner numbers to improve as 2013 rolls on.
“It (the weakness) has continued longer than we would have expected following those state government changes,” she said.

“But at some point you would expect to see that turn.”


Thursday, April 18, 2013

Why buy second grade when you can buy new: Benefits of buying new

There’s nothing quite like the feeling of something new, they say however does that imply anything when buying a new home?

There will always be that particular rush that you can feel when buying something new, whether it be new clothes, a new car or even a new house.

This is exactly why it isn’t a surprise and can easily be understood why purchasing a newly constructed home or investment property is a trendy buying pick for many Australians.

Buying new requires fewer upfront costs; this is just one of the most titillating features of buying new.

Several unanticipated costs, such as maintenance fees or repair bills, for instance, can immediately consume into the money you intend to put aside by purchasing an existing dwelling.

What is more, and basically the very apparent reason to buy something new is, newly built properties traditionally carry a warranty of several years so if it happens to run into problems with your new purchase, the warranty can save you.

A new home can without doubt be an intelligent pick if you are in the market for an investment property.

Contemporary building standards can mean a greener, more sustainable investment aside from the new look and design that will certainly appeal to potential tenants.

In addition take into account that new utilities and appliances, for example bathroom, kitchens and heating can be a massive draw card for tenants and should be measured when you come to bargain the weekly lease.

Lastly, don’t neglect the depreciation and taxation benefits allied with buying an investment property over and above the government incentives that can go along with purchasing a new home to live in.

Benefits are most of the time at their peak when a property is brand new.

But you must take note that new and older properties mutually have their pros and cons and whether a new asset is right for you is eventually down to your precise state of affairs. If unsure, seeking for professional advice would be an excellent subsequently decison.

If a new property does fit your financial and investment strategy, though, the benefits should be considerable.

Tread with caution: There is much compensation to buying a new property compare to an existing dwelling, but remember that regarding all property-related decisions, vigilance is necessary.

To lessen risks, think about the following prior to making a purchase:

•Capital growth is NOT guaranteed, whether you purchase a new or an older property.

•Research is essential. Be absolutely certain to do your homework on the property market and purchase in an area that is more likely to offer growth potential.

•Know with whom you’re dealing. Unfortunately, there are several stories of
developers who go bust during a development or turn out not to be professional operators. Take note of the developer’s history and speak to family and friends regarding developers they have used in the past.

Tuesday, April 2, 2013

Loan Fraud Connected To Drug Houses



Police allege, a scoundrel home loan broker get hold of more than $17 million of fraudulent loans for clients, several of whom utilized the money to purchase marijuana grow houses.

Studies and investigations are ongoing into Kieu Thi Thanh Huynh, who has permitted more than $100 million in loans in the precedent seven years, and her clients. The 43-year-old Kim Huynh has been accused with 93 counts of getting hold of financial benefit by dishonesty or decemption, constructing phony documents and exploiting counterfeit documents.

An additional 30 people were charged with one count all of taking financial advantage by deception, creating counterfeit documents and using false documents as fraction of the police operation code named Squid.

Persons charged are of Vietnamese origin and array from youngest as 21 to 68 years old. They were under arrest between February 25 and March 8.

On May 24, the alleged scammers have been bailed to appear at the Melbourne
Magistrates Court for a committal mention.

A police spokeswoman said there may be more arrests.

”Inquiries are continuing in relation to a number of associates who investigators allege also purchased homes using false documents and gained financial advantage by deception.”

On February 25 police carried out five search warrants at three houses in St Albans, Sunshine and Sunshine North, seizing computers, financial documents, phones and jewelry.

Grow houses purchased with loans purportedly attained by Ms Huynh were exposed at some stage in Operation Taxa, which has concluded in millions of dollars value of marijuana and possessions being detained from dozens of houses, mostly in Melbourne’s north-west.

Police will charge loan documents associated to Ms Huynh were found in some of the houses.

All are involved in the investigation such as officers from the Criminal Proceeds Squad and E-Crime Squad, along with forensic accountants,.

Grow houses raided during Operation Taxa had mostly been linked to Vietnamese crime families, who were increasingly buying houses in new residential estates in Melbourne’s outer suburbs as opposed to renting them, Fairfax Media reported last year.

The trend had shown the increased financial clout of marijuana traffickers, police said at the time.

Head of the Criminal Proceeds Squad Detective Senior Sergeant Andrew Kerr said the squad had seized $25.2 million worth of property linked to marijuana in 2012, an increase of about $700,000 compared with the previous year.

He said the squad had detected that a significant amount of money was being sent overseas by those involved in the marijuana trade in Victoria. ”This is money that is being sent overseas by people that would appear to have no legitimate sources of income in Australia.

”A lot of these people are on Centrelink benefits, yet somehow managed to send
significant amounts of money overseas. How is that happening? And why is that happening?”

This kind of frauds that should be taken more seriously not only it is a fraud itself but it stepped a notch as they have been doing marijuana and who knows some other drugs.
Fraud prevention is clearly need to be improved.

Fraud Prevention Against Mortgage



The distraught state of the national housing market, combined with high unemployment, has shaped a lush environment for deceitful fraudsters looking for a chance to take advantage of frantic homeowners. Several homeowners who go with loan modification or foreclosure “rescue” companies for assistance in the end discover that they have been scammed. An up-and-coming inclination in latest months engages mortgage aid relief scams. These scams intent homeowners by means of promising to save them from foreclosure, or maybe get them a reverse mortgage or at least lower their
mortgage payments. This is all in exchange for an advance or monthly fee. But as expected many of these homeowners never get the relief they have been promised.


These scams utilize a range of effortless strategies to spot their financially-distressed sufferers. Various scammers trace troubled borrowers from published foreclosure notices or other publicly-available sources. But others anticipate on mass-marketing modus operandi such as flyers, radio, television and Internet advertising to entice in distressed borrowers. Still others misleadingly propose an association with a government agency to hastily get the conviction of unsuspecting victims.


The Consumer Protection Branch in the Justice Department’s Civil Division is
committed to prosecuting these criminals and bringing justice to their victims because this fraud is so subtle, and looks for victims on folks who are at their most defenseless point. But persons are really number one as potential victims in the fight in opposition to mortgage fraud. Fraud prevention and scam watch id their goal. You can protect yourself from mortgage fraud by keeping the following fraud prevention tips in mind:


If their promises seem too good to be true, they usually are. Be cautious of those that get in touch with you by means of advertising such as flyers, radio/television or the Internet with guaranteeing to adjust the conditions of your mortgage.


Be apprehensive of loan alteration services that necessitate signing a contract or paying an up-front or monthly fee. Advance fees are normally forbidden by law. Loan counseling and modification services are usually offered free from your lender and/or a Department of Housing and Urban Development (HUD) counseling center. Contact toll-free 24 hour hotline to immediately speak to an expert advisor.


In no way you should convey title of your property, do mortgage payments to someone with no less than your lender, or discontinue making mortgage payments in general .These are definite habits to put your financial investment at risk.


Cautiously examine the names, seals, logos and representations completed by
mortgage rescue companies. They may perhaps be intentionally intended to trick borrowers into not doubting a connection with a government agency exists. The point of this is to swindle borrowers into thinking they are at liberty to the advantage of a government program rather than consigning to a loan that is an obligation to be repaid.
A government agency will by no means necessitate advance fees, or pledge a precise outcome.


Most scammers doing reverse mortgage loans are in reality want to drop off other financial products on borrowers. Be alert to keep away from brokers that would like you to get hold of a loan in order to purchase other products such as long-term care insurance, annuities, or other investments.

Wednesday, March 20, 2013

Affordable properties in 2013

Been waiting to have your own house for the first time, then maybe 2013 is the best time for you to do so. The budget has some good news for you. For the first time property buyers, the finance minister has extended an additional benefit of Rs 1 lakh on home loans up to Rs 25 lakh.

This deduction will be on top of the deduction of Rs 1.5 lakh allowed for self-occupied properties under Section 24.

Nonetheless the regulation is that the property should not cost more than Rs 40 lakh. This rule means a outsized number of buyers in metro cities will not be qualified for the added benefit.

“This would mostly be helpful for people who want to buy a house in smaller cities or distant suburbs where the ticket size is lower,” says Niranjan Hiranandani, chairman of the Hiranandani Group.

You are probably wondering if and how much tax you can save but the thing is the additional deduction will not last forever. From the time period of 2013-14 and 2014-15, this maximum span of two years is the only time you can claim it. It is known that interest rates on home loans today range between 9.5% and 11% so a buyer will be able to claim deduction for the entire interest. You would have to pay about Rs 2.48 lakh as interest in the first year if you take a Rs 25 lakh loan for 20 years at 10% interest,.

You can claim the entire amount as a deduction in 2013-14. The Rs 1.5 lakh under Section 24 and the remaining under the additional deduction are the entire amount you can claim. The remaining Rs 50,000 deduction can be availed of in 2014-15 if your loan is smaller and you pay only Rs 2 lakh as interest. A buyer can accumulate between Rs 10,000 and Rs 30,000 a year depending on his income slab although the cost of property is a blockade.

One more notice which would create after-effects to the real estate sector is the 1% tax deducted at source (TDS) on the transfer of immovable property with a market value of more than Rs 50 lakh.

This will add to the paperwork for buyers aside from the increase in transaction cost.

“A person would now need a TAN (Tax Deduction Account Number) to deduct tax on behalf of the central government. So once a buyer gets a TAN, only then can he purchase an immovable property. He is paying only 99% of the value to the seller and the balance 1% to the government,” says PranayVakil, chairman, Praron Consultancy.

New luxury projects will also become more expensive at the same time as the TDS will impact all property transactions, counting the resale property.

From 75% to 70% has been reduced to the rate of abatement on homes and flats of more than 2,000 square feet or costing Rs 1 crore.

“Effectively, this translates into an increase in service tax outflow, which means that luxury housing will now become even more expensive,” says Anuj Puri, chairman & country head, Jones Lang LaSalle India.

Tuesday, March 19, 2013

Know Why You’re Decline

Been wondering why you are still disapproved and your application is declined even though you have received pre-approval and found a property to purchase? There could be reasons why you are declined for formal approval. 


The pre-approval was worthless: If from the beginning, you had an on the spot approval or system generated approval then you loan was never really approved. In that case, therefore, your loan will be declined because it does not meet and in fact never did meet the lenders policy. 

The LMI provider declines your home loan: Your bank possibly will approve the loan; however, ten the bank may need approval from their Lenders Mortgage Insurer as well if your loan amount is more than 90% of the property value. Generally a loan is pre- approved by the LMI provider who has unlike guidelines to the lender. The Insurer may reject your loan. 

The security property is unacceptable: The property that you are purchasing is not appraised when you apply for a pre-approval. When you notify the bank of the type of security property you are buying, they may not approve the loan because of the peril implicated. You can find a list of the types of properties that are usually improper to lender on your property types page. Most people aren’t conscious that their bank may not accept inner city apartments, units under 50m2 or hobby farms, so they sometimes buy them without first examination with their bank. 

The pre-approval has expired: Pre-approvals are usually valid for three to six months, depending on the lender. Your pre-approval will no longer be valid if it takes you longer than this to find a property. 

Your situation has changed: The lender will re-assess your application if you change jobs, get a car loan / credit card or have some other aspect of your situation change, since your loan was pre-approved. If you no longer congregate their lending policy, your loan will be declined. 

The lender’s policy has changed: Some lenders will honor pre-approvals that are lodged before their policy changes; others will only formally approve your loan if it meets their new lending policies. Most lenders tweak their lending policy on a monthly basis. 

Interest rates have increased: If interest rates boost then the maximum amount you can borrow will cut. Initial home buyers often get a pre-approval for the maximum loan amount possible. This means that if the rates increase, their formal approval for that loan amount may be declined.

Thursday, March 7, 2013

Speed the Help for the Nevadans’ Homeowners




$200 million from federal government was given to Nevada to avoid homeowners from losing their homes.  Nevada had the highest foreclosure rate in the nation but a Reno Gazette-Journal analysis of the fund distribution confirms that the money was almost intact in the past two years.

Nevada only spent $21 million of the $194 million it was to be paid to homeowners facing foreclosure, this means only 11% of the money it received through the Obama administration’s Hardest Hit Fund, this is according to the most recent reports of the analysis of U.S. Treasury the third quarter of 2012

“This is government bureaucracy at its finest,” said Victor Joecks, communication director of think tank Nevada Policy Research Institute. “They can’t even give away $200 million. This program is a perfect example of why government shouldn’t pick winners and losers in the economy.”

According to Nevada Hardest Hit officials, just in January, the nonprofit gave $7.2 million in direct aid to help homeowners avoid foreclosure.  A total of $28.4 million was given by the program since it began in mid-2010, which is only 5% of the allocation. More or less 25 % of what they have given out was given out in January.

Mortgage assistance and principal reduction are the two separate components of the state Hardest Hit Fund program that has much given the aid.  75 percent of the budget went to direct aid from July 2011 to June 2012; this is another analysis of yearly financial statements obtained directly from the nonprofit.

“We are getting more money out of the door than we have ever before in a much shorter time frame,” said Candice Kelley, Nevada Hardest Hit Fund executive director.

 

Federal help to hardest hit


Many have tried to attend to the greed and carelessness that caused the housing crisis, they are the Government programs, public policy changes and a closer eye on financial service providers yet there are still many homeowners suffering from the collapse of the housing market.

And Hardest Hit Fund was one of those who are concerned homeowner programs.

Hardest Hit Fund was launched in 2010 by the Obama Administration mainly to help distraught homeowners in places that suffers from deep home price declines and high unemployment.  Nevada together with 17 other States and the District of Columbia are getting more than $7.6 billion to help homeowners prevent foreclosure.  The program ends in 2017.

“What states have had to do through this program is really unprecedented,” said Andrea Risotto, spokeswoman for the U.S. Treasury Department. “They have created their own servicing shop so that they can directly assist homeowners, evaluate them for help, process their application and help them transition from one form of assistance to another.”

Each state verifies what support their residents need, including mortgage assistance, short sales and unemployment programs.

Out of the $7.6 billion, Nevada was given $194 million.  Nevada Affordable Housing Assistance Corp., a nonprofit organization, was selected to head the program for the Nevada Housing Division. Mortgage payment assistance, principal curtailment, short-sale assistance and second lien assistance, are the types of programs Nevada offers.

The objective is to lend a hand to more than 10,000 Nevada homeowners avoid foreclosure.

Kelley, the nonprofit’s executive director said that the program didn’t want to overextend its allocated fund and needed to process the applications it already had in the pipeline.  This is because the nonprofit had to stop accepting new applicants in mid-December since of the increase in the number of Nevadans asking for aid.

She further added, the Hardest Hit Fund is aggressively working through the current applications, and the fund will reopen to new applicants.

Nonprofit and Treasury officials said when much of the first year of the Hardest Hit Fund’s existence was focused on setting up the infrastructure, staffing and marketing the program, many people, including mortgage companies and banks, were unaware of the program and its requirement, making it hard to help distressed homeowners.

“There are a number of states where we are still seeing homeowners really reluctant to reach out for help,” Risotto said.

Both Kelley and Risotto said that, also those homeowners who did apply early on were discouraged because they were rejected on eligibility requirements.  After that, the program has altered its eligibility requirements more than a few times to comprise a wider range of people. Those who were formerly discarded now could meet the criteria if they reapplied.

Nationally, more than 100,000 homeowners were helped with $1.1 billion of direct assistance since the program began, Risotto said. About $1.7 billion out of the $7.6 billion has been committed or budgeted to homeowners for future payments.

California, with the highest allocation of almost $2 billion, has helped more than 22,000 borrowers. North Carolina, Michigan, Ohio and Florida follow, Risotto said.

Joecks, with the Nevada think tank, said the only people who benefit from the program are the politicians who use it to generate publicity. The institute is against the Hardest Hit Fund program because it believes it is unjust, he said.

“It’s a perfect case study of how the government promises something, and it doesn’t end up being delivered as promised,” Joecks said.

“The Hardest Hit Fund rewards those who make poor financial decisions at the expense of those who make good ones.”

 

Who did it help?


According to the latest quarterly performance report the state submitted to the U.S., there were more than 6,000 applicants in the past two-and-a-half years and more than 2,700 homeowners have been given assistance by the Nevada Hardest Hit Fund since they are the only ones who qualified.  Nearly all borrowers made less than $50,000 and cited either unemployment or Sharon Logue applied for the program in August and was approved for principal reduction assistance in January.

Since six years ago home prices skyrockets, she bought her Carson City apartment at the peak of the market because it’s all she could afford that time.

“I thought I was doing great, but then things just went downhill,” she said.

After another six years, her home is values 30 percent of what she initially bought it for. Her mortgage payments make up nearly half of her paychecks after a job change last year and decrease in salary.

“Right now, it’s paycheck to paycheck,” she said. “I can’t save any money because I don’t have any extra money. If there’s an emergency, whip out the credit card and take care of it later.”

Logue makes her payment every month and is looking into ways to stay in her home.
“Usually, I don’t ask for handouts,” she said. “I’m very stubborn and have my pride, but there are just some times you have to put those aside and ask for help to make life better.”

Her loan servicer was not able to help her either because of restrictions in her private mortgage insurance. You must get PMI when the down payment is less than 20 percent of the value or sales prices.  Then she discovered Hardest Hit Fund in August.

“I didn’t want to foreclose,” she said. “To me, that’s not right.”

She found that the Hardest Hit Fund staff was helpful.

She was given $50,000 in January in principal reductions but she has run into the same PMI roadblock as she did when she tried to refinance.  Every the bank representatives told her that she is blocked from any action because of who the PMI is with or the type of PMI.

Now she is finding other banks that might take on her loan.

“I’m at a block,” she said. “ ... Something needs to happen or else I’ll be stuck.”

She is determined not to get foreclosure although she has until May to obtain the financing to use the Hardest Hit Fund.

“It’s like right there,” she said. “I have their certificate, but now, I’m stuck.”

 

Middle of the pack, but not for long


Even as Nevada spends its share of the federal money to help homeowners slowly, it falls in the middle of the pack for the 18 states and Washington, D.C., that also received money through the Hardest Hit Fund.



Oregon had spent about 40 percent of its allocation which is $88.7 million by end of the third quarter in 2012.  This is the latest date provided by the U.S. Department of Treasury. Washington, D.C.  Rhode Island on the other hand, according to the RGJ analysis, follows by using more than 30 percent of their money.

Arizona is the state slowest to spend, only $11.6 million was spent which is 4 percent of its $268 million.  6 percent of their share was spent by New Jersey, Georgia and Indiana.

According to the administration responsible for the money in Nevada, the said slowness of distributing the funds to responsible people who need the funds and stabilize the economy is sensible.  But Joecks sees otherwise, they have had three years to develop a more efficient process.

Joecks also countered the program for only helping rareness of underwater homeowners in Nevada. That’s not enough to make a difference in the overall housing market, he said

According to the latest data released by real estate data provider CoreLogic in January, the total value of all U.S. homes with negative equity during the third quarter of 2012 was $658 billion.
“States have to make decisions about how to balance helping homeowners and protecting taxpayers because it’s a government-funded program,” Risotto said. “All the states have been looking closely at their data that they are gaining from the first months of their program implementation and trying to make smart decisions about who is still struggling in their state and how they can best reach them to prevent foreclosure.”

The Hardest Hit Fund is just one tool in a host of other offerings to help distressed homeowners, U.S. Treasury officials said.

“It is a targeted program to help address some of the needs struggling home owners are facing in these states,” Risotto said. “It is meant to complement many of the other efforts federal and state governments already have under way and that mortgage companies, themselves, are offering today, that they weren’t even offering a year ago.”

Lately, the help to distressed homeowners sped up, the nonprofit Nevada Hardest Hit Fund has its distribution of U.S. Treasury funds a bit more faster.

“We are trying to be appropriately conservative with administrative costs,” Kelley said. “We want to make sure we have the right people on hand so that we can quickly respond to these applicants.”

In answer to the boost in applications this year, the Nevada Hardest Hit Fund gave jobs to more than 40 people. It has nearly tripled that number through community partnerships to process the applications.

Before the application process was put on hold in mid-December for those already in the pipeline, the nonprofit was getting at least 800 phone calls a day, Kelly said. She was unable to say how many borrowers currently are in the application process.

With the current trajectory of funds being approved, she said, hey will allocate all of the $194 million before the 2017 deadline.

“We suspect that the future outlays for the months to come will continue to be more and more aggressive because the demand is there,” she said. “We have expanded out partnerships so that we can respond in a faster way.”

The participating states expect that they will have spent a majority of the allocated funds by 2014, three years ahead of schedule, Risotto said. Rhode Island closed its application process in January, because it already has committed all of its funds. Several other states are expected to close this year also.

“We are all very committed to getting the assistance out of the door as quickly as possible while the need is still so great,” she said.